Three-Street Frontage Project Triggers Strict Summer Construction Ban to Guard Narrow Manderville Road
Key Points
- Mandatory summer construction moratorium and parking restrictions applied to 175 Lower County Road project
- Willow Street addition approved for residents transitioning to full-time Harwich living
- Board debates standardized parking conditions and "Gale case" interpretations for decks and bulkheads
- Dave Wilson introduced as a prospective alternate member to address board vacancy crisis
Congestion concerns on one of West Harwich’s narrowest ways led the Zoning Board of Appeals to mandate a summer construction moratorium for a significant renovation project at 175 Lower County Road. The property, owned by James Martin’s 175 Lower County LLC, presented a unique challenge to the board as a lot with frontage on three separate streets: Lower County Road, Manderville Road, and a third layout.
Robert Dwire of Bracken Engineering explained that the applicant sought to modernize a pre-existing non-conforming home on the undersized lot. We are proposing renovations and additions, including removing the portion of the dwelling that is 6.1 feet from the road to create a new setback of 13.1 feet,
Dwire said, noting that while the home would remain non-conforming, the project actually increases the distance between the structure and Manderville Road. Chair Brian Sullivan noted the rarity of the site layout, stating there is certainly no lack of frontage. This is the first time we’ve seen a case with frontage on three sides.
The project drew scrutiny from neighbor Sean Harrington of 28 Manderville Road, who warned the board about the seasonal gridlock on the narrow street. Manderville Road is so narrow that taking the curb cut off the front, I think, is a problem,
Harrington told the board. Everybody parks on the street anyways, so you can't get through and it's terrible in the summertime because it's one way.
Harrington’s testimony prompted the board to advise the applicant against formally abandoning their curb cut with the Highway Department, even if they landscape over it, to ensure off-street parking remains an option in the future.
Responding to Harrington’s concerns, the board implemented a strict summer moratorium. Motion Made by B. Sullivan to accept the documents, findings of fact, and conditions of approval as stipulated. Motion Passed 4-0-0. A second Motion Made by K. Dixon to grant the Special Permit for Case No. 2026-04 subject to conditions including no demolition or exterior construction between June 30th and Labor Day, and a requirement that construction vehicles do not block any public or private right-of-way. Motion Passed 4-0-0.
The board also reviewed Case No. 2026-03, involving a single-story addition at 88 Willow Street for owners Lisa and Ray Irvine. Architect Tom Carlone, representing the couple, explained they are moving to Harwich full-time. They are seeking to develop the addition in a way that doesn't make the side yard setback any worse than the original 16.5 feet,
Carlone said, adding that the addition was stepped back
to maintain existing non-conformities. Member John August described the application as straightforward
and noted no issues with the design.
Acting Clerk Kenneth Dixon noted that the Health Department requires a Title 5 inspection before a building permit can be signed off. Motion Made by B. Sullivan to accept the documents and conditions. Motion Passed 4-0-0. Following the closure of the public hearing, a Motion Made by K. Dixon to grant the Special Permit for 88 Willow Street. Motion Passed 4-0-0. Member Chris Murphy participated in the unanimous approvals for both residential cases.
Beyond specific applications, the board debated broader policy shifts regarding parking and zoning interpretations. John August advocated for making the parking and egress restrictions a permanent fixture of all town permits, not just those requiring a special permit. I'd like to see the parking/egress condition made permanent for all projects, not just the ones that come before us,
August said. Sullivan agreed, stating he would discuss the matter with the Building Commissioner.
The board also addressed technical interpretations of the Gale case,
a legal standard that often allows for the expansion of non-conforming homes. Sullivan expressed concern over homeowners using small, as-of-right
projections like decks to later justify larger additions. I don't believe a deck under four feet should establish a pre-existing non-conformity that allows someone to later build a full house addition out to that same line,
Sullivan argued. He also noted that the Building Commissioner has recently put the brakes
on allowing new bulkheads to extend into setbacks, particularly as they relate to new basement egress codes for bedrooms.
The meeting concluded with the introduction of Dave Wilson, a prospective board member with a background in engineering and biotech project management. Wilson is expected to join the board as an alternate in April, helping to alleviate a vacancy crisis that has left the board without backup members for months.