Saquatucket Dredging Delay Hinges on New Harbormaster Review of Public Ramp Use
Key Points
- Saquatucket Harbor joint dock dredging tabled pending review by new Harbormaster
- Ice heater bucket operation leads to "scary" spike in municipal electric bills
- Seasonal aluminum dock approved for the west end of Long Pond
- Long Pond wooden dock extension and permitting authorized
- Committee prepares for potential channel encroachment debate at Oyster Creek
Concerns over the commercial use of public infrastructure led the Harwich Waterways Committee to postpone a decision on a Saquatucket Harbor dredging project Wednesday night. The committee opted to table the proposal for a jointly owned dock near the Harbormaster’s office until a new Harbormaster, slated to begin on March 31, can review the logistics of offloading dredge spoils at the state-owned public boat ramp. Project SC-217 involves reconstructing a pier and removing 99 cubic yards of material, which consultant Mark Burgess of Shorefront Consulting suggested could be efficiently moved via barge to the ramp.
Burgess explained that the process would involve a barge pushing containers to the ramp where a truck would meet it. Truck backs down... they take it bag and all throw it in the back of the truck. Not a very long time for them to unload,
Burgess said. However, the Committee Chair expressed hesitation, noting that the ramp is a high-traffic area for commercial boat haulers and recreational users. The Chair stated, I just feel comfortable with the new Harbormaster just taking a look at that proposal for unloading that. Mark can explain it to him.
This caution aligns with a broader trend in Harwich where boards have become increasingly protective of municipal infrastructure amidst a period of administrative transition and a significant personnel vacuum
in town leadership. Motion Made by K. Considine to table SC-217 until the next meeting. Motion Passed (Unanimous).
The committee also grappled with scary
utility costs reported in the monthly financial update. The Chair highlighted a significant spike in electric bills, which was attributed to the constant operation of ice heater buckets during a harsh winter stretch. We have definitely those ice heater buckets have run like triple time this year compared to what they normally run. They were running constantly,
the Chair reported. While the committee is currently managing the impact, the Chair warned that the next billing cycle might be even more challenging, stating, I think you're going to see on the next one scarier.
Two residential dock projects on Long Pond received approval. Project SC-238, a new 74-foot seasonal aluminum dock at the west end of the pond near the railroad bed, was described by Burgess as a standard plain brown aluminum seasonal dock.
The Chair noted that a site visit revealed no navigational issues. Motion Made by C. Flynn to approve project SC-238. Motion Passed (Unanimous). Similarly, the committee approved Project SC-256 at the south end of Long Pond near 7th Avenue. This project permits an existing wooden dock and adds an 11.5-foot extension. Burgess dismissed concerns about the added length, noting, If somebody runs into this because it's 11 and a half feet longer than it's been for 20 or 30 years, they shouldn't be on the water.
Motion Made by D. Don to approve project SC-256. Motion Passed (Unanimous).
Procedural matters opened the meeting, including a correction to the spelling of member Dan Yui Don’s name in the previous minutes. He did say that his name was misspelled like three times differently for whatever that's worth in the minutes,
Don said of a previous draft. Caleb, a committee member, clarified the distribution of the materials, noting, I sent them out separately because maybe I had—when I first sent them in... that was for the agenda.
Motion Made by J. [Member] to accept the minutes with the name correction. Motion Passed (Unanimous).
Looking ahead, Burgess provided a preview of upcoming projects in Oyster Creek, including a dock and boat house rebuild and a new dock at 41 Nons Road. The latter project may prove contentious, as the proposed vessel would reportedly encroach on the deep water channel by one foot. This potential conflict echoes past committee debates regarding the 50-foot channel standard in the Harbor Management Plan. The committee intends to conduct site visits at low tide to evaluate the narrow channel before the next meeting.