Physical Window Samples Resolve 73 Route 28 Renovation Dispute
Key Points
- Commissioners approved window replacements for 73 Route 28 after viewing physical samples of exterior grills
- Board removed a default 1915 build date for a Snow Inn Road boat house following evidence from 1930s Land Court plans
- Building Department was directed to issue an enforcement letter to 115 Route 28 for failing to install required faux chimney caps
- Paul Doane will advocate for the 18-month demolition delay article at Town Meeting to counter negative board recommendations
Residents of historic properties in Harwich saw a rare display of physical evidence Wednesday night as the Historic District Historical Commission moved to resolve long-standing disputes over architectural details and building ages. James Twitchell, representing the property at 73 Route 28, presented the board with physical window samples to settle a conflict stemming from previous incorrect guidance provided by the Building Department. The dispute, which had left the owner facing a potential $10,000 loss on incorrectly ordered windows, centered on whether the replacements would feature exterior grills to maintain the home’s 19th-century aesthetic.
Twitchell explained that while Simulated Divided Lites would cost over $300 per window, he could provide applied exterior grills for $173 each. I wanted to physically bring it so you could actually see it instead of trying to show you a picture,
Twitchell told the commission. These are applied from the outside with double-sided tape and they go directly on top of the ones that are there. So you won't see them.
Chair Mary Mazlowski noted that the applied grills are what we typically like to see on the outside
for homes of that age. Motion Made by B. Looney to find the proposed work does not diminish the historic value and to impose no demolition delay, with the condition that front windows facing Main Street have applied exterior grills. Motion Passed 4-0-0.
The commission also corrected a historical clerical error regarding a boat house at Zero Snow Inn Road. Owner Jack Welch and attorney Bill Croll presented Land Court plans from 1931 and 1934 to prove the structure was not built in 1915, which the town frequently uses as a default date for older buildings. Croll argued that the 1934 plan’s omission of the building was definitive, stating, Land court doesn't let you leave off a building. So that 1934 plan would have had a building on it had it needed to have a building on it.
Welch intends to renovate the structure, which currently suffers from a rotting roof and flooding, into a writer’s studio for his daughter. While member Paul Doane expressed initial confusion over map scales, the board ultimately agreed the structure was likely built much later than the town's records suggested. Motion Made by L. Zalis to remove the 1915 build date from the property record for Zero Snow Inn Road. Motion Passed 4-0-0.
Stricter enforcement was the theme for 115 Route 28, where a former inn was converted without installing required fake
chimney caps. The caps were a condition of a previous approval to maintain the historic silhouette after the functional chimneys were removed. Mazlowski noted the property is currently being sold, making immediate enforcement critical. It appears that they have not yet done that,
Mazlowski said of the installation. Motion Made by P. Doane to request the building department issue an enforcement letter to ensure the chimney caps are installed. Motion Passed 4-0-0.
Looking ahead to Town Meeting, Paul Doane offered to lead the advocacy for a proposed 18-month demolition delay article, despite negative recommendations from the Select Board and Finance Committee. Doane, who noted his long history with town preservation efforts, said the argument about the 18 months is really just that it buys us a little bit of time to interrupt the construction cycle.
He also reported progress on securing preservation restrictions for the West Baptist Church, suggesting the town attach the restrictions to the deed during the property transfer process to ensure the landmark's protection. Lynn Zalis noted the urgency of commission business, particularly as the town continues to face administrative hurdles and procedural "nightmares" regarding historical inventory accuracy. Motion Made by L. Zalis to adjourn the meeting. Motion Passed 4-0-0.