Queen Anne Road Housing Development Advances Through Finalized Land Disposition Agreement
Key Points
- Trustees signed the Land Disposition Agreement for the Penrose project at 4, 5, and 6 Queen Anne Road
- A public presentation by the Penrose development team is scheduled for May 14 at 3:30 PM
- The Trust decided to host the upcoming forum at Town Hall despite concerns about a 56-person room capacity
- The Chair confirmed the project will soon begin the application process for state tax credits
The Harwich Affordable Housing Trust has cleared a major hurdle for the redevelopment of 4, 5, and 6 Queen Anne Road, moving the Penrose affordable housing project into its implementation phase. During Wednesday’s meeting, the Trust reached a unanimous consensus to finalize the Land Disposition Agreement (LDA), a critical document that outlines the terms under which the town-owned parcels will be utilized for development. The decision follows a series of executive sessions where the board reviewed the complex legal frameworks prepared by Penrose legal counsel and the town’s legal representative, KP Law.
The Chair clarified that the LDA encompasses both the land transfer and the ground lease, streamlining the process into a single formal action. This is the point where we agreed to finalize the documents that have been prepared by Penrose legal and Harwich Town legal,
the Chair explained, noting that the agreement was carefully crafted to protect individual board members. You'll note... this is carefully worded as being signed as the Trust, not as individuals, but as trustees.
Motion Made by Trustee 2 to approve the Land Disposition Agreement for 4, 5, and 6 Queen Anne Road as prepared by Town legal and Penrose legal. Motion Passed (3-0-0).
With the legal paperwork moving toward signatures, the Trust turned its attention to a major public presentation scheduled for May 14 at 3:30 PM. Charles Adams, the head of development for Penrose, is expected to attend with staff to present the concept plan and discuss the upcoming Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) comprehensive permit process. The Chair emphasized the importance of public transparency, stating, They will review their proposal and concept plan to get it out to the public. This will be televised.
The logistics of the upcoming presentation sparked a debate regarding venue capacity and accessibility. While the larger Griffin Room was unavailable due to a Water Department hearing, the Trust opted to remain in the Town Hall small meeting room—which has a capacity of 56 people—rather than moving to the Community Center. The Chair expressed a preference for the Town Hall setup, noting, I'm not real fond of the layout there [the Community Center] for presentations.
However, one board member raised concerns about potential crowds, noting, If we have too many people, do we have to continue it? People cannot be in the hallway. We have to be able to accommodate them.
Bob, representing the Community Preservation Committee, participated in the discussion to ask about the project's next steps regarding state financing. Does Penrose have to do that certificate of eligibility first for state tax credits?
he asked. The Chair confirmed that the upcoming presentation would mark the beginning of that process, aiming to ensure all town boards and the public understand the shared responsibilities of the Trust and the developer moving forward. While other members remained mostly silent during the procedural deliberations, Trustee 1 noted they had no questions
regarding the finalized LDA, and Trustee 2 lightened the mood following the successful vote, suggesting, I feel like we should go celebrate.